Nothing will make a bigger difference in global warming than transportation tranformation. Below is a link to a New York Times article that outlines where the major car companies are today on development of hydrogen vehicles. They're come a long way. In fact, if the fueling infrastructure were in place today, there would be viable cars to buy. And they would be bought.
On the Road, Hope for a Zero-Pollution Car
The Toyota Prius modified by ECD Ovonics, and the Honda FCX look particularly promising, but credit is also due to Ford and GM. Their engineers have been hard at work for years, despite being undercut by old tech, old business allegiances, workforce inertia, and oblivious marketing managers.
Meanwhile, we have Lee Iacocca placing his bet on the plug-in electric car in his new book, Where Have All the Leaders Gone. It's worth quoting a couple of questions and answers from CNN Money's recent interview of the author:
What do you think of global warming?
I campaigned for George W. Bush in 2000 and against Gore because I thought Gore was a little nutty when he was talking global warming. Now I think it's a serious problem. As I said in my book, I never thought I'd pay $8 to go see Al give a PowerPoint presentation. There has to be a solution that everybody's got to join - the whole planet, not one country - and so I've become a believer. I didn't get too enlightened until years after I left the auto business.
What can the auto industry do?
Plug-in hybrids. I think they're virtually here now. We've still got to get better batteries, of course, but hybrids are good. Expensive and complex, but they do the job and get good gas mileage. That's the wave of the future.
Some people are betting on hydrogen-powered fuel cells.
I think that's way off. Where are you going to get all that hydrogen? How are you going to store it in the car? How are you going to distribute it? That's a long-term problem.
We wonder whether Iacocca would have modified his view if the Times article had been out before he finished his manuscript, which would have been at least six months ago. NEW's view is that both technologies are desirable and necessary. Bring 'em on.
Here's a link to the full Iacocca interview at CNNMoney.com.
Today there's no excuse for this administration to ignore the perception around the world that the rhetoric about wars of ideas is just a cynical canard; a cover for oil greed. The administration's hesitation to associate foreign oil imports with terrorist strength, and its refusal to require Americans to undergo any discomfort, financial or physical, in order to subdue and strangle the enemy, is just mystifying. The hands-off attitude makes us appear to be in bed with Big Oil. Despite protestations to the contrary, perceptions count. In this matter, the U.S. looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck.